sapphoq raps about current events, politics, anti-censorship, fundamentalism, war, and anything else that strikes her fancy and radical being.
Friday, July 12, 2013
Equality, Neurology, Multiculturalism, Religion, and Legislation
"Christianity neither is, nor ever was, a part of the common law." -- Thomas Jefferson, in a letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814
We are not all "created equally." We do not get born with a blank slate, in a state of original sin, or in a state of innocence. A blank slate is quasi-psychology. Original sin vs. innocence is a religious vs. philosophical debate. I will have none of that. We just get born.
Our Apgar scores are different at birth. We are not all born with the same one. We are not born in identical states of health. Some babies are sickly. Some are robust. Some are in-between the two. As babies grow, their personalities, behaviors, reactions to stimuli, likes and dislikes all become increasingly evident.
We humans vary from each other in intelligence, abilities, personality traits, and neurology. Whether our differences are determined by genetics or environment or some combination, we do not all have the same chances in life. One child excels in mathematics at school. Another struggles. One child is able to manipulate pens and pencils and art supplies with skill. Another not so much. A third has perception problems which renders their work in art class as slovenly or jumbled.
In our awkward haste to assure ourselves that we are all human beings underneath the scariness of our differences, we are subject to shoving aside those differences and join in the chorus of the litany of "Why won't theys?" sometimes asked in slightly different formats: Why won't they get clean? Why can't they snap out of their funk? Why don't they do something else when after all they themselves admit that what they are doing is not working? Why do they refuse to get off welfare/disability/the public dole and get a job like everybody else? Why don't they just get over "it"? Sometimes I get tired/ don't feel like working/ drink too on weekends but I take care of my responsibilities/ go to work/ control my drinking. What's wrong with them?
And hey, this nation was founded as a christian nation. Women should not abort ever. Kids ought to pray in school. It's majority rules. Atheists/ muslims/ hindus/ blacks/ whites/ drug addicts/ those crazed tea party folks ought to. Such a shame she is fat-- she has such a pretty face. When I get old and incontinent, that is the time to smother me with the pillow. Death panels. [Note: We already have them-- they are called insurance companies. When an insurance company denies coverage for certain conditions or medical procedures, yeah sometimes the patients die]. Political correctness. You think you got it tough now do ya? When I was young.
As individuals, we are alike enough to [hopefully] recognize each other as human. But we retain our differences which ensure that we do not all have equal chances at success. Some folks may give in to their laziness [yes, I've been there but now I can call myself on it and then go do what needs doing]. Some folks with traumatic brain injuries have malfunctioning frontal lobes which cause them to not be able to initiate activities. Some folks may have lesions in the left side of their brains which [dependent upon the location] may dictate limited insight. If you possess insight into your problems, you can thank the left side of your brain. You can set goals and take steps to achieve them? Thank your functioning frontal lobe. Sometimes some of us make excuses for our bad behaviors. Sometimes there is an underlying neurology at work. I know what I don't know today. And I know what I know.
Anchoring-- the act of deciding what is correct and what isn't-- is an attribute or action that occurs within our brains. This anchoring has evolutionary value. When a group of people are able to decide what is acceptable, what isn't, and consequences for those who don't follow the protocol, there is a society, a civilization, a culture, and a legal structure. When anchoring is not working as well as it should in a person, that person is apt to try on many different behaviors and values. When anchoring works too well, a person will hold on to old explanations long after they have been found to be inadequate.
Not every culture is worthy of admiration all of the time. On one hand we have advances in mathematics and medicine, architecture and the arts, education and electricity. On the other we have child brides, forced marriages, genital mutilation of females, genocides, politicians who excel at being reckless with the truth, and shady governmental agencies whose function is to spy on everyone everywhere. Cultures are neither equally admirable nor are they equally humane. In the rush to embrace multi-culturalism, we ignore the truth that not all cultures are "equal" at our own peril.
Any group that thinks of itself as elite or possessing special knowledge and thereby desires to impose its' cultural beliefs and values upon "everyone" is capable of evil. Besides the obvious example of the German Nazis and the Holocaust, there is the conflict between two artificially created tribes in Rwanda, one buddhist sect warring with another buddhist sect in Cambodia, the roman catholic church desiring to impose it's stand on abortion and end of life care upon everyone to the point where hospitals are being bought up all over various communities in the United States by catholic organizations. And the kicker-- now corporations have "feelings," borrowing a phrase from Stephen Colbert.
Catholic employers don't want to have to pay for birth control for its' women employees via employment-based healthcare plans. It doesn't matter that these same catholic employers accept public funding for payment of some hospital bills. It doesn't matter whether or not the women are themselves believers. And yeah there are other reasons for using birth control [pills]-- to control abnormally heavy menses and in the treatment of certain estrogen-stimulated cancers to name two of them. Politicians and employers and religious entities, please remove yourselves from my vagina. What I decide regarding birth control, a morning after pill in the case of rape, abortion in order to save my health or my life or in cases where the fetus is not viable [such as one without a brain stem] is quite frankly none of your damn business. All of those things ought to be between me and my medical doctor. And since when is the life or the health of a woman of less value than the life of a fetus?
With the repeal of D.O.M.A., Governor Huckabee expressed his butt-hurt on Twitter (registered trademark). That is his right. Folks responded by tweeting their agreement or non-agreement, as is their right. In expressing my disagreement with his views, I did not engage in name-calling. Respectful disagreement does not require such. Part of my expressed opinion involved the idea that as adults, we [ought to] get to choose who we love [as long as the lover is another adult]. Some folks are monosexual. Some folks are bisexual. Some folks are asexual. My niece married her [female] lover recently. We came together as a community to publicly affirm and support their marriage.
We are not enslaved by our sexual orientation. Those non-straight folks who are committed a religion which forbids homosexual activity can certainly decide to remain celibate if they choose to do so. In a state of celibacy, the attraction to one gender is not acted upon. [Voluntary celibacy is certainly financially cheaper than attending certain ex-gay seminars and treatments]. Other non-straight folks, along with some straight folks, choose to work within the framework of their chosen religions in order to effect change. Thus we now have Dignity, Integrity, and other groups within the bodies of some religious bodies.
Yeah, I think our government should get out of the marriage business altogether. If two adults are granted legal recognition of their partnership by a judge, that should be referred to as a civil union. If two adults are married by clergy-- catholic, baptist, buddhist, pentecostal, hindu, pagan, jewish, b'nai, muslim, unitarian, or other-- that marriage should be referred to as a marriage. Both should have the same rights and responsibilities.
Whether or not the United States ever was a christian nation, it certainly isn't one now. There are people here of every belief and of no belief. Yet, there are times when the rights of people to practice the religion of their choosing are protected over the rights of people who do not practice a religion.
The removal of bike lanes from a heavily hasidic populated area of Brooklyn so that hasidic men would not be subjected to scantily clad women on bicycles is a law that put religious beliefs over public safety. [http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/bike_war_paint_g7EizkFEZktV3IlNUJosQM]. In another known incident, an attempt was made to apply an anti-sodomy law to two same-gendered adults who were allegedly having anal sex in the privacy of their own residence. [Lawrence vs. Texas, 2003. http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_laws4.htm]. The actual alleged incident occurred in 1998 and was allegedly reported by a neighbor who may have allegedly harbored ill-feeling toward the two men. A protracted legal battle resulted.
Yes, Rick Santorum [and Governor Mike Huckabee], I certainly do support the right of two consenting adults to engage in sexual expression of their choosing within the privacy of their own residence. I support the right of a woman to abort a fetus-- especially if her life or her health is endangered by the pregnancy. I support the right of two adults to be recognized as a legal domestic partnership or as a marriage-- their choice. I support laws which are lobbied for by religious people so long as those laws do not infringe upon the rights of non-religious people. [Hasidic jews do not "own" the streets of Brooklyn. If they do not wish to be subjected to the ranks of un-modestly garbed bicyclists, they can avert their eyes or better yet, build and reside in a gated hasidic community]. I support the existence of public education as a secular education. [Those that wish a sectarian education can home-school or attend a school which is run by a religious outfit]. I have no desire to force my non-theism on others. I am willing to respect the fact that you believe. Please respect the fact that I do not share your beliefs.
radical sapphoq
Friday, March 09, 2007
LETTER ***adult*** 3/9/07
Relaxing in the sunshine my brother Joey and I are, reading the funny papers. Joey, he likes the sports section. At least that's what he says. Them scrawny ass chickens got out of the pen again. We thought-- being Sunday and all-- we'd let them roam. Maybe we could get more money for them at the market, being free-range and all. We don't go to church anymore. We're done with that racket. Them people at the end of our road they're right good neighbors and all-- ha! They called me and Joey queer.
Queers and in-breds and filthy tobacco road. Like their own shit don't stink. Them Marbo twins down the road are the worst of the lot, cornhol'ing each other out in Mrs. Pika's hayfields last July. I caught them I did as I went a'walkin' looking for the cows that had escaped through the open gate. Them filthy Marbo twins left the gate open I knows they did. But the joke back-fired as I seen with my own two eyes what they was doing. Pulled up their britches real fast they did I tell ya'. And they call me and my god-born brother Joey queers. Goddamn them little punks.
They set the hen house on fire they did last Christmas. The sheriff up here he is a useless piece of trash. Marbos' cousin I reckon. He said he ain't coming up here no sir. He don't want to catch no homo disease and the law be on his side. He steppin' out regular with the pastor's wife he does. But he sits all prim and proper in the church listening to his own wife singing in the choir. Yes he does. With his shiny white suit and his gentleman's cap.
Me and Joey, we ain't really brothers. Me and Joey, we are queers. And we don't go to that church no more. Jesus he is a hermaphrodite and a queer too. And he must got pretty good hearing cuz he's the only one who listens to me cry at night into my pillow cuz Joey done threw up again or pissed the bed and gettin' skinnier by the breath.
Yessir, that's right. We are the queers here in this here place and Joey got the homo disease he does. And he's gonna die right here and no one is gonna care when I point the end of the gun into the center of my queer in-bred forehead. No one gonna care. 'Cept for maybe Jesus the queer hermaphrodite who listens to queers dieing from the homo disease even though the church god don't.
signed,
Amos
Friday, December 22, 2006
GOOD FOR GOODE 12/22/06
Goode wants illegal immigration to be cut down to zero and he wants legal immigration to be cut back. He is opposed to any more immigration of Muslims from Middle Eastern countries. One pro-Muslim organization based in the U.S. sent him an English translation of the Koran. It was suggested that he read a specific verse relating that people and nations were not created to hate each other.
I suggest that all the people screaming about this read the entire Koran. Then goto http://www.outragedmoderates.org/, click on the Government Document Library, find and download the chapters from a terrorist training manual there and read them word for word. Then come back and state honestly that Islam is peace-loving and so was the founder.
For the text of the letter which Rep. Goode sent to his constituents, goto: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,237990,00.html
radical sapphoq says:
I don't care what book a member of congress uses to swear on when taking office. I do care about a future possibility of Muslims becoming a majority in the United States and/or in public office. While I remain an avid supporter of separation of church and state, I also totally support Rep. Goode on his position on immigration. Good for him for not backing down! If that makes me a bigot, then so be.
radical sapphoq
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/12/21/quran.congress/
http://www.charlottesvillenewsplex.tv/news/headlines/4994466.html
http://www.charlottesvillenewsplex.tv/news/headlines/4983096.html
http://www.asiantribune.com/index.php?q=node/3798
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/
chi-0612220053dec22,1,4809344.story?coll=chi-newsnationworld-hed
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/editorials/
articles/2006/12/22/an_open_house_for_all/
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-muslim22dec22,1,6491840.story?
coll=la-news-politics-national&track=crosspromo
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/politics/4419910.html
Wednesday, December 20, 2006
DO I OFFEND? ONE EXPERIENCE WITH ONE MONOTHEIST 12/20/06
WHY RELIGIONS SOMETIMES PROMOTE HATRED, VIOLENCE, AND GENOCIDE .
I was in attendance at a somewhat public meeting this weekend where it came to pass that some of the folks in attendance were speaking about their monotheistic male christian god in rather lofty and glowing terms, additionally claiming that they "knew" or were seeking to know said god's will for their individual lives. When it came my turn to speak, I advised that I was "sitting in a room of mystics." I asked who this god was and how do we know his will? I went on briefly to mention that people are killing each other in the Middle East right now believing that it is their god's will for them to do so [a mild simplification and thus an under-truth I know]. I also brought up the idea that here in our own country some of us g.l.b.t.i.q. folks are being denied the same basic civil rights that other American citizens take for granted. The denial of our basic civil rights is based partly on what some folks perceive is their god's will for all of us. Thus, I have a problem with this whole mystic experience thing. I shut-up then and the get-together ran its course. My friends are a varied bunch of folks and I love them. My good-natured questioning is nothing new to their ears. The event ended on a rather difficult note. One woman in attendance [an acquaintance rather than a friend] made last second comments about someone violating our cohesiveness as an organization which mystified me.
This evening I had occasion to run into the woman who grandstanded the gathering over the weekend. I asked her to explain what she was talking about. She said, "I was talking about you." I suggested that it might be better for us to sit down and communicate directly with each other about this. She said she thought that the group needed to know. I told her that grandstanding does nothing to improve communication between us but sitting down and talking about our differences might. She had forgotten the word I had called them [mystics] and didn't know what grandstanding was. I told her, adding that I also had my own experience with grandstanding and that is why I recognize it. She bristled then. I tried to explain the difference between unity and uniformity-- I was guessing that her real objection to my opinion lay more in that area. She informed me that I "shouldn't share" my personal struggle. I asked her where that was in the by-laws of said club. She stuttered a bit and finally said, "You make some people feel insulted" or something along those lines indicating that her feelings were my responsibility somehow. At last, the crux of the matter. I told her that is the risk we all take in communication. [I chose not to address the idea that I could make anyone feel anything.] She turned away then, and I left as I had other matters to attend to before sleeping.
I am aware that monotheists certainly do not have the monopoly on intolerance. We Pagans, Witches, Heathens, Druids can also lay vigorous claim to that turf. Anyone who has been involved in a Witch War knows this. And yes, some of us refer to Christians as x-tians. And a few of us boycott certain businesses run by Christians just as some Christians boycott pagan-friendly or glbtiq-friendly businesses. Everyone is guilty of intolerance. No one escapes with innocence in this life.
It is mental masturbation to presume that I know the whys and wherefores of any other human being's actions. I do not totally understand how it is that what I say can provoke such a strong reaction in one individual. I do not have to know.
What I do know is that in a casual circle of human beings, I have as much of a right to put forth my doubts about what others are talking about as much as everyone else there has to speak about their monotheistic male christian god in rather lofty and glowing terms. I endeavor to accord basic human respect to the human beings that I come into contact with in my daily life. In the course of average human relations with other adults, I expect the same basic human respect. I don't care if people respect my spiritual path. And I certainly am not asking for anyone's approval. What I want is to exercise my freedom of self-expression. And I want others to exercise their freedom of self-expression too. A difference of opinion is not something that violates any principle of an honest healthy relationship between two or more human beings.
Thursday, December 14, 2006
THE GREAT CHRISTMAS DEBATE 12/14/06
Actually I don't really care if employees of a store wish me a "Merry Christmas" or a "Happy Holiday." I usually smile and tell them I celebrate Solstice. Some of them know what that is and some of them don't. The blaring Christmas music-- much of it religious-- and the flashing light displays don't do much for my well-being but I know it will be over and things will get back to their secular normal in January.
Here I will insert the recent hoopla about Rabbi Elazar Bogomilsky complaining about the Christmas trees over at Seattle-Tacoma Airport. The airport managers ordered the removal of the trees. Some employees rebelled by bringing in their own little trees to display by their work areas. Actually, the rabbi didn't want the trees removed. He wanted an electric menorah to be included in the welcome display. The trees are back and Rabbi Bogomilsky has offered to donate a menorah. No word yet on whether or not Seattle-Tacoma Airport will take him up on the offer. I found myself saying, "Oh gee, ordering the removal of Christmas trees is going to far" but then hesitating when I read that it was a local rabbi objecting.
Then we have the whole question of religion in the public schools. Personally, I do not want my bisexual atheistic Witch tax bucks going to support a public education system where even a few teachers feel free to proselytize for Christ and to promote Intelligent Design in science classes. Right now most public school students come from homes where some form of Christianity is practiced. The argument that the majority of kids are from Christian households does not hold water with me. This is one issue where I differ with my good friend Jeremy Crow.
I still believe in my heart of hearts that the job of public schools is to provide a public education, that Intelligent Design discussions properly belong in philosophy or comparative religion classes, and that it is the parents who are responsible for instilling their own religious beliefs and traditions in their children. Teaching about religions is certainly different than promoting a specific ideology in the classroom. Of course, there are violations on both sides of the issue.
In my mind, a teacher who: forbids students to read their sacred texts during free time, downgrades homework and essays which include religious themes by virtue of their inclusion alone, or the passing out of religious material from one student to another [student who is willing to take it] is guilty of not following the rules regarding freedom of religious expression in public schools. So is the public school teacher who: prays with students, witnesses to students, or otherwise endorses any particular religious ideology during classroom time.
For several weeks, I was drinking the poisoned kool-aid which stated that Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. I have since become enlightened to other facts and figures from non-Muslim sources. Whether or not the numbers of adherents to Islam will outstrip the number of Christians in our lifetime is a matter up for debate. If the United States ever was to become primarily Muslim, what would happen then? Muslims, I am told, do not celebrate Christmas. Some Pakistani Muslims celebrate the birth of Abraham though most Sharia Muslims consider that holiday to be "an add-on" rather than one that the Prophet intended. If any other religion was the religion held by the majority of American citizens in the United States, would Christians want that religion to be given endorsement by public school personnel? I think not. What ifs aside, we get all caught up in words and then the press adds to the confusion or to the fury-- depending upon how one wishes to perceive these things.
Unfortunately, many of my liberal friends have bought into the story that the president of Iran is a nice guy, that the American press is somehow distorting his views on the Holocaust [basically: it didn't happen, or, it happened but it wasn't all that bad] into something else, that we oughta give nukes to the Iranians and to the Syrians to "fix" Iraq. The president of Iran is not nice, he was one of the student-leaders-turned-terrorist during the take-over of the American Embassy 27 years ago. He denies the impact of the historical Holocaust and in fact is sponsering a two-day event regarding that. His government and the Syrian government both hold un-upstanding records of upholding human rights for all of their citizenry. Add Iraq's government to that last one, as well as Afghanistan, Pakistan, and a few others over there.
I don't know the "answer" to all the stuff happening in the Middle East. I do know that perpetrating lies does no one any good. The lies that feed the stupid American pubic are thriving. Grown-ups know that not everyone wishes us well. And so this Christmas, this Solstice, this Kwanzaa, this Chanaukah, this whatever winter holidays I've left out, forgot, didn't know about, failed to acknowledge; my sincerest hope for all of us even overrides any hope for peace. I hope that we all remember this: Kool-aid is for kids. Adding cyanide to it can still kill off bunches of people.
radical sapphoq
Tuesday, December 05, 2006
THE ADVANCED BONEWITS' CULT DANGER EVALUATION FORM 12/5/06
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
MORE DRAMA ALA ELDER RAVENFIRE 11/29/06
Elder Ravenfire's proboard was taken down for TOS violations a couple of days after my initial review of his board. Since then, he has apparently been rather busy loudly protesting-- among other things, an e-mail he has gotten from an alleged group of witches which took it upon
themselves to "warlock" him. I have copied and pasted said e-mail and "Elder" Ravenfire's response below for your reading and edumacation. By all means, after reading his post or posts on the proboards, please scroll through all of the messages to find the truth of it.
Because "Elder" Ravenfire has taken it upon himself to litter the internet with this hoax of a letter and his response, I am reproducing it as found on a few proboards. If anyone wishes to google Elder+Ravenfire, a host of search results will indicate that this is so. Ergo, since "Elder" Ravenfire has pretty much pitched the content into electronica, I am doing my part to help him in his quest to, as he says it, spread the word of this council.
And just so y'all know, the person behind the e-mail has admitted that it was a hoax. At any rate, here it is as found on one proboard
http://evylynrose.proboards13.com/
index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=1163877931&page=1
and another
http://www.mysticwicks.com/showthread.php?t=144833
and a third
http://triplespiral.proboards83.com/
index.cgi?action=display&board=general&thread=1163877685&page=1
in a post attributed to Elder Ravenfire:
Here it is, the end of peace, and love as we know it to be. People go around proclaiming to be protectors of the Craft, and deeming people unfit to be Witches. And spying on Forums, and on people. Is that what the Craft is now? Have we became Jedi? And need the Jedi council like this? What, and who do they think they are? Of course I’m speaking of this so called secret council of guardians of the old ways. Or whatever they call themselves. They go around spying on people and deem them unfit to be Witches because they won’t bend to there will, or believe the same as they do. It is something that needs to be dealt with. If left alone The Craft will be ruined. These people make people think they can banish them from the Craft. Make their magick not work, forever! Here this is what was sent to me
and it's an order I cannot ignore. I tried to warn you RavenFire. I
really did, but this is what you get.
Anyhow, ever obedient to the Guardians... .
We, who are the secret Guardians of the Craft of the Wise for North
America, in Council assembled, have been apprised by our agents of the
conduct of one [omitted by sapphoq], who resides on [omitted by sapphoq] and
who styles himself as "Elder Ravenfire." Having given this matter due
consideration we are now minded to render our judgment.
We find that that this man [omitted by sapphoq] aforesaid has arrogated unto himself
titles, offices, and authority which are in no way his by right or by
accomplishment. Further, we find that he has abused the intelligence,
discretion, and abilities which the Gods have seen fit to grant unto
him, and that in sum, his actions have been of such a nature as to
bring discredit and ignominy upon the Craft of the Wise, which we are
sworn to protect and uphold.
Wherefore we, the Guardians of the Craft of the Wise for North
America, in Council assembled, do hereby banish, expel, and warlock
this man [omitted by sapphoq] aforesaid from the company of all who practice the
Craft of the Wise, to wander the grey mists, alone and friendless. And
we further lay upon said [omitted by sapphoq] a binding and curse, that each and
every work of magic that he may essay from this time forth shall fail
utterly and come to naught. And these penalties both shall lie upon
him for this lifetime and for all lifetimes to come.
So say we all, who have the right, and the authority, and the power to
enforce this, our Will, in this matter. Wherefore we have set unto
this working both our sigils and our signs manual.
So Mote It Be.
This unfortunately is permanent Ravenfire. I'm so sorry.
And they really believe this! They really believe they have this power. Ending with So Mote it Be. With blasphemy. How dare they do this. And some people really think they can do this. I lost one Coven member because of this crap. I think these people need to be stopped. There is no need for liars to be running around telling people they are not Witches, and telling them that they are warlocks. This is stupid. I have the target of attack, after attack. And I have had it. I will spread the word of this council. I will do my best to end there rain of horror. And not let them destroy another person.
My email is [omitted by sapphoq]
Blessed be, Elder RavenFire
Sunday, November 19, 2006
EXITING THE LIFE 11/19/06
There existed in Albany NY for at least one summer Sunday night Christian meetings of a sort housed in a second-floor flat near the gay juice bar. I do not know which organization they represented nor what methods they used nor their success rate. None of my friends or acquaintances disappeared from the scene during the late 80s to take up a new straight life. They must have pulled from different parts of the community than the radical in-your-face activists that I was a part of and hanging out with.
How very odd in this day and age when GLBTIQ activists are protesting the inclusion of non-heterosexuality in a Department of Defense list of defects and conditions [an improvement over being considered as a "mental disorder"?] that the ex-gay movement would remain a source of hatred by those of us who celebrate our non-heterosexuality. Yeah, I am familiar with all of the arguements.
People in ex-gay ministries and counseling outreach services do occasionally wind up in bed with each other or with a wayward staffer. A few? some? folks seeking to get out of the life may feel deep self-hatred. Most? All? ex-gay places are run by fundies and we have suffered prejuidice and discrimination at their hands for eons. And yes, the monosexuals [homosexual and heterosexual] in the population do tend to believe that sexual orientation is static rather than fluid.
The bisexuals among us [that is the tribe I fall into] tend to believe that sexual orientation is fluid and [will at least give lip service to the idea] that one's sexual orientation throughout life can change and all of them are equally valid. AIS [Androgen Insufficiency Females] statistically are 100% either attracted to women or to both women and men. A few transgendered friends going through the procedures to match their external gender to their internal gender have experienced a genuine but unplanned sexual orientation change shortly after the introduction of hormone treatment.
So if seeking to trade in my sexual orientation for another one via the path that some people have chosen is not for me, I still do not have to invalidate those who have made different choices than I have. A campus which allows gay-straight alliances and glbtiq clubs to meet needs also to allow ex-gay groups the same privilege and voice that we experience and expect. A workplace which discriminates on the basis of past sexual orientation ought to be as offensive to the civil rights activist as one which discriminates on the basis of present sexual orientation.
A pastor who has recently confessed to dealings with a hustler [male prostitute for men] deserves respect for seeking to address his failings, regardless of how he chooses to do so. Ted Haggart has admitted to despising that part of himself which engaged in male one-on-one sexual conduct and will be seeking counseling from James Dobson [Focus on the Family leader, for those of you living in a news vacuum] because he wants out. Ted Haggart is married and he has broken his marriage vows. If I broke my marriage vows-- regardless of who I broke them with-- I might hate that part of myself too.
Give the man a break people. He done wrong. He is going to fix it the best he can. If he comes out deciding that he is gay or bisexual or straight I really do not care. I hope for his wife's sake that he is able to remain married to her and faithful to her alone. The GLBTIQ community is not the real victim here. Sure, Pastor Ted Haggard has been identified as someone who has been part of the very vocal system out in Colorado which would deny us civil rights. Should we deny him his right to decide how he wishes to conduct himself in his personal life?
The fact that restorative therapy has been dissed by the American Psychological Association back in August does not mean that it should be outlawed. Other mental health bodies have come out with statements of the dangers inherent in change ministries. Dangers like increased depression and self-loathing were mentioned. Reparative therapy has many uses with varying results-- depending sometimes on who is doing the reporting. Quite frankly, Haggard does not deserve to be on exhibit as "proof" that sexual orientation cannot be changed. And yes, even if he never embraces our struggle for civil rights, I hope he is successful in "exiting the life."
-radical sapphoq
http://www.telegram.com/apps/pbcs.dll/
article?AID=/20061118/NEWS/611180351/1116
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/529619_1
http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/
nation/11/19/19haggard.html
http://www.365gay.com/Newscon06/11/111506soulforce.htm
http://www.pathinfo.org/index2.htm
http://www.progressiveu.org/221844-the-ex-gay-movement
Thursday, November 09, 2006
ELDER RAVENFIRE PROBOARD 11/9/06
I had the occasion today to visit the proboard run by one elderravenfire, his wife, and a younger relative helping out. If you want to get an idea of what pagans, witches, and wiccans are like, don't go here:
http://elderravenfire.proboards103.com/
Elder Ravenfire is a young man with a good idea and bad execution. His misspellings make it difficult to read his posts. His false ego makes him argumentative when someone in a particular trad tries to correct his misinformation. He and his wife both fall back on the idea that no one should ask him for his sources or correct his misinformation because (a). that is disrespectful, and (b). apparently reality is totally subjective so no one has a "right" to say that anyone's information is not accurate. There are examples of him cussing out posters when their views square his littered all over the board. His antipathy towards research and proofs is astounding.
Thumbs down, along with all of the other fingers.
reposted from http://sapphoq reviews.blogspot.com/
