Utterly Amazing

Legal disclaimer: It is not my intention to defame anyone, to call anyone names, or to drive them to do bad things.  Everything that I've expressed below is my own opinion and only my opinion.  It does not bear the weight of law or of much else.  These are my opinions.  Part of the risk of freedom of expression is that we will run into others exercising their freedom of expression that we do not care for nor agree with.  If you do not care for my freedom of expression as found in this blog post or on any of my blogs, then by all means use your back button.  To remain is a sort of mental masturbation.


Once again-- just today-- I notice that there is yet another headline on http://www.cyberwarzone.com related to Lori Handrahan courtesy of "Bigs".  This is rather unfortunate.  When I surf over to cyberwarzone, I certainly am not there to read more about the latest claims of widespread conspiracy and pedophile rings involving one child.  Claims which the courts have steadfastly rejected.  There is something underneath the clamor in this particular chain of events that really bothers me.

What bothers me is The List.  The List in this case refers to the people, organizations and agencies within the state of Maine, and various departments within the government of the United States all of which Lori Handrahan is accusing of terrible and grave wrong-doing.  In reading through the various court documents available on-line [and there are many of those], I found some indication of a conspiracy theorem at work in Handrahan's brain.  It was not until I began to read through the emails written by Handrahan-- also freely available online-- that I caught a glimpse into the machinations of The List.  [ref: http://radicalsapphoq.blogspot.com/2013/03/so-whos-abusing-who.html].  While The List may not exist in a literal sense, it is obvious to me that the number of bad guys are ever-expanding.  Here is an example:  Over a period of months, Handrahan writes to the U.S. Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement [I.C.E., or ICE] alleging that her ex-husband is residing in Maine illegally, got a green card under suspicious circumstances, should have been deported, was granted American citizenship under compromising circumstances, was involved in organized crime in Eastern Europe along with his family.  [Note the escalation there].  Having not received the satifaction of the Department doing her biding, a later email asks ICE if they are profiting from the selling of the young child into sexual slavery via a vast pedophilia ring operating in the State of Maine.  First she emails them for help over a period of months.  Then they become a target of her pedoheads-under-every-bush campaign.

In the United States there is something called the chain-of-custody.  Every bit of evidence referenced to or presented in a court proceeding must have gone through it.  When a woman brings the feces of a child into the Emergency Room, there is no chain-of-custody.  That particular feces sample might have originated from the child.  It also may have been picked up from a pile of dog shit in the park.  Or perhaps Mom, a second cousin, or the homeless dude on the street corner could have been pressed into service.  We simply don't know.  Taking it further, when Mom gives a friend a sample of the child's urine we don't know if the child urinated that sample of urine or not.  Even if the friend is a nurse, that friend did not gather the urine sample during the course of her duty.  That friend obtained the urine sample from the hand of Handrahan. 

Having studied all of the court documents and other items related to Lori Handrahan available to me on the web, I've got an educated guess about what will happen on April 17, 2013 when Handrahan is slated to show for a court hearing.  Whether the excuse is her fear of getting arrested in the State of Maine or that the date and time is inconvenient to her, it is my bet that she simply will not be there.  Handrahan has a partial history of skipping court.  If she does show up this time, I will admit to being shocked.  

Quite frankly, I think nothing short of a stint in the state pen will get Lori Handrahan to knock off the web publicity that she has been ordered to stop.  I am not entirely unsympathetic to the existence of a real or suspected personality disorder in an individual.  Nor am I unsympathetic to the difficulties involved in treating a human being for any mental condition and in particular personality disorders.  But Handrahan has not sought out treatment.  She has remained without any sort of counseling rather than get some counseling in exchange for being allowed to visit the child.  Voluntary treatment can and does work well for some number of people.  Handrahan does not wish mental health services.  While it can be argued that both options are dehumanizing in various degrees, to me talk therapy is preferable to doing prison time.  The evidence all over the Internet remains: Handrahan continues to publicize unsubstantiated information about the existence of a child porn ring in Maine.  It seems to me that she is using the existence of the child for her own self-promotion.  She keeps doing so in spite of a judge's order to quit it.  Although I hope that Handrahan will be able curtail the exhibition of her narcissistic rage all over the Internet, there is also the health and well-being of the child to consider.  The importance of the life, privacy, and security of the child must outweigh any consideration given toward the possible role of any mental conditions in the actions of the mother.  Even a mental condition that may have had partial origin in the possible abuse of the mother herself as a young child.

radical sapphoq says:  Maybe I am just another jokester hanging out on the electronic wires.  Even this jokester does not make fake Anonymous accounts on Twitter to give artificial credence to the lie that Anonymous is my personal army.  Anonymous is not my personal army.  I hate that the name of Anonymous was brought into this whole conflict between a woman, a man, and their child.

I have no axe to grind, I have no checks from Michael Waxman to cash, and any attempts at trolling that I've made in my youth resulted in FAIL.  Mad skillz in trolling-- I don't got 'em.  

Lori, I don't know you.  I am just another blogger in a vast sea of bloggers.  I wish for you the best but I fear the worst.  The worst is to live in the misery imposed by a personality disorder and/or other mental condition and/or untreated childhood trauma without the recognition that it doesn't have to be this way.  The only true shame in having a mental condition is to give in to it on a daily basis rather than addressing the issues.  It takes bravery and strength to ask for help.  Lori, I believe in you.  



http://www.cyberwarzone.com/legal-threats-waxman-lori-handrahan-about-exposing-her-daughters-child-abuse

No I didn't die

I've been one of the clone-drones participating in Linden Lab's SecondLife:
http://www.secondlife.com/

where indeed there are political discussions and pretty much everything else in the virtual world as there is in real life. There is even a group or two who protest the rampant consumerism that exists in SecondLife. Anonymous is there, replete with flying phantom boxes and pictures of old men getting it on with other old men and bedsores. Anonymous has land there on SecondLife (no I won't say where. Let's just say that as a bisexual woman, I am willing to ignore the ribbing of gays and feminists because I support Anonymous when it comes to Scientology.) A.A. meetings are there. So is an active Aspie community as well as some t.b.i. survivors.


A brief synopsis of what I think about some of the current events going on:

1. It appalls me that President Bush welcomed the Pope with such open arms. Used to be that fundamentalist Christians were equating the Pope and the Vatican and the Roman Catholic Church with such things like the Beast, the mark of the Beast, and going to hell. Okay, so politically the President couldn't snub the Pope I suppose. But did Bush really have to go pick up the Pope himself? On the plus side, as far as I know, no rounds of golf were shared by the two of them during the Pope's stateside visit.

2. I am sorry that the government is giving most of us a rebate check because the country is in financial debt. On the other hand, I could use the money. Anyone who really hates the idea is welcome to send me their cash.

3. I am weary of the Clinton/Obama run-off. I want them to get it over with and just pick whoever is going to run on the democratic ticket. And I am not convinced that the country will be better off with either of those two as president (if the Democrats "win.") I mean, some folks wanted a Democrat-controlled Congress. So far I haven't seen any great things come out of this Congress.

4. I hate VESID.

spike

CARRY ME HOME TO OL' VIRGINNIE 4/22/07

I happened to be in Denver the other day cabbing it to the no-tell motel after a meeting of Narcotics Anonymous. The cab driver decided that he would talk to me about the shootings that happened in Virginia. Cab driver has four sons, two of them are in college. One of them is in Virginia but not in THAT place. Cab driver went on at length about gun safety and teaching his boys to be responsible about guns. It sounds rather dreadful in the retelling but it really wasn't. The conversation I found to be more enjoyable than downtown Denver was during rush hour.

There are some things about law and mental hygiene law [nope, not laws for those who like to read or look at porn] in particular that folks do not know, do not understand, or haven't had to know or understand. The disclaimer goes like this: I am not a lawyer and you are a jackass if you are relying upon this blog for legal advice. End of disclaimer. "The law is an ass." I must admit here that I do not recall who said it first but I sure wish I had. Anyone who doesn't agree is living in a different universe than the one I've had to deal with my whole life. Or perhaps they just disagree and that's cool too.

The young man who shot up all those students and then died too was hospitalized for his mental difficulties in 2005. Here is something which the cab driver did not know and maybe some of you don't either. If the young man admitted himself-- signed himself in-- then he can truthfully answer "no" on any sort of application which asks if one was ever committed. Most of us mental nutcases, whether we've ever been on any sort of mental hell unit or not, are aware that being 2P'ed [signed in forcibly by a physician and a physician crony physician] is the absolute worst thing one can do in terms of preservation of any sort of human rights. Thus most of us try very very hard to remember that when being threatened with a 2P, it is better to yield pen in hand and sign ourselves in. Under a 2P, a mental health sort of kangaroo court has to do a review every so many hours-- it might be 72 and then in decreasing frequencies-- in order for the hospital to maintain its' hold. It is easier to get out of a mental hospital if we have signed ourselves in-- even A.M.A.
That stands for against medical advice. I agree it is somewhat ludicrous to speak about human rights on a nutward but bear with me here.

So the young man who signed himself in has no proof of disordered thinking when he shows up at the gun shop or wherever to buy his own personal weapon of mass destruction. Fact is, as long as we weren't ever 2P'ed [and maybe sometimes if we were], there is no flashing light following us around screaming, "Don't sell that moron a gun." Maybe we can thank the lawyers for that one or at least thank the idiots at the ACLU who would be comfortable with someone like me having access to a gun, but I digress.

Furthermore, as far as good to excellent mental hell treatment, that is in itself an oxymoron. We do not know what good to excellent mental hell treatment is. Mental hell treatment-- counseling in particular-- does not have a gold standard of care. There is no scientific validity measure attached to talk therapy. People like to talk about talk therapy because somehow it seems more humane than shoveling psychotropics down the throats of those whose lives are unfixable any other way. There is no evidence that counseling works. There is evidence that for various specific conditions the pills do work.

We know for example that someone who has genuine bipolar disorder I [useta be manic depression] has an excellent chance of medicine actually working. We also know that someone who has genuine bipolar disorder I who is unmedicated runs a seriously high risk of that disorder becoming worse, period. [It's all on Medscape, folks.] And we know that pills and combinations of pills do not work well at all for the serious personality disorders that people come down with [assuming that the diagnosis is accurate and not based upon therapist prejudice]. We know that folks with traumatic brain injury traditionally need more of the psychotropic variety of medicine and less of some other classes. And so on.

Here is some really bad news. Read it several times until it sinks in. Ready?
Mental health professionals are notoriously BAD at predicting who
is a danger to society and who isn't.
The F.B.I. people are talking to serial killers and some of them are writing books and it is all fascinating but unless you are a serial killer behind bars, ain't no one really knowing how to look for you before you actually kill anyone. Same goes for kids shooting other kids in school.

Here are some of my own suggestions:
(1). Dump the insanity defense totally. If you are going to say, "I did it but I am nuts" or "I did it but I am nuts and therefore not responsible for my self" or "I did it cuz I am nuts and I don't know when or if I will do it again" etc., then you deserve to be locked up away from society, period. I personally don't care if they lock you up in a mental hospital or in a prison. Harsh? Too bad.
Equal rights are not special rights. If we truly believe that we the mental nutcases deserve the same civil rights as other civils, then we have to be willing to accept the same consequences for bad behavior that everyone else gets to have. Anything less is burrsit.

(2). Anyone who has ever been actively suicidal should not own a gun for any reason. [For exceptions, see number five].

(3). Anyone who has symptoms of personality disorders should not own a gun for any reason. [For exceptions, see number five].

(4). Anyone who has ever experienced a genuine psychotic state should not own a gun for any reason. [For exceptions, see number five].

(5). For exceptions: Let the shrinks sign off on the pieces of paper giving us permission to own and use firearms. And let them share in the responsibility if we make any bad things happen during our handling of a firearm.
Risk-taking is risky. Shrinks are notoriously bad at predicting who is a long-term risk to society. Fine them real money for every person that we kill [including ourselves] with our guns and give that money to the families of the victims. Here's a prediction of my own: No shrink will agree to sign that piece of paper for their patients if their best shrink misjudgment will cost them shrink money. Off the wall? Tough. If I am that off the wall, then why are you still reading this?

radical sapphoq

SETTING FIRE TO A BUNDLE OF STICKS 1/24/07

In the latest evidence that we are becoming a mental hell nation, an actor voluntarily entered counseling after calling another actor a "faggot." Isaiah Washington apparently used the offensive epitaph towards actor T.R. Knight [who actually was not present] during an argument or disagreement. Washington also met with folks from GLSEN and he has agreed to help out in some campaign designed to teach those not in the know how hateful and painful the word "faggot" is.

In a loose nod to "NoNameCallingWeek," I myself a bisexual dyke, have to admit a certain state of perplexity over why a disagreement or an argument between two actors off-stage or backstage is even worthy of news reporting. Hopefully, the talk therapy that Isaiah Washington gets will do more than just teach him to "play nicely with others."

The use of the word FAGGOT is not the problem. The problem is a society which has been white-washed by political correctness into intellectual dishonesty. I would much rather know directly that someone just doesn't like me-- whether it is because of my sexual orientation or any other -ism-- than have people be phony to my face and real behind my back.

But then again, I've been accused of some rather froward thinking.

radical sapphoq